April 11, 2005
-
My memory is going…
I am not sure whether it’s a sign that I’m becoming an old fart, but I write everything down. If some idea comes to me, I start looking for a pen and a piece of paper so I can put the gist of it in writing before it leaves my head, as fast as it arrived. When I’m at the computer, working, some “insight” often pops into my mind (often in the middle of writing something else), so I end up starting a session of Notepad, just so I can quickly put down the bare bones of what just popped into my mind and save it in some soon forgotten file with a cryptic name like 0504-blog-73-brainfarts.txt. At the time it makes sense; when I come across the file six months later it seems like I must have been high at the time I saved it.
I was re-reading Mother Theresa’s words from yesterday’s entry, and it struck me that we have some remarkable biases in our society. “Whatever obstacle you encounter, persevere anyway.” That’s pretty much the message from her words. Yet, our environment, and the Talking Heads who call themselves experts on psychology, would insist that adopting such values is really an indication that you’re a chronically codependent wuss who’s in serious need of developing some backbone and assertiveness. Their maxim: If someone is rude to you, don’t “love them anyway”, kick ‘em in the shins!
I suppose I shouldn’t be surprised. The mainstream of the world is oriented towards teaching “survival skills” not towards “living right.” David Hawkins– a mainstream M.D. turned enlightenment guru– asserts that 74% of the world’s population lives at a “destructive” level of awareness. And that’s the rub, isn’t it? If you are living at a low (“destructive”) level of awareness, the things you teach people around you are also going to be destructive.
Hmmmm…..
The issue that causes me more lost sleep than any other is “choice.” Let me back up a bit. If you’re into the whole self-improvement, finding-inner-peace, transcendence journey you’re probably also familiar with the notion that the end to personal “suffering” (or some similar term meaning “how do I end my inner pain and confusion“) comes through transcending the ego, or killing the ego, or some other such ideal. It seems to me that what must really be “transcended” are the fixations associated with the ego– but that’s a whole other ball of wax. But let’s just say, for grins, that I am trying to live my life from a place that’s not governed by ego. What happens to “choice?”
Where does “choice” end, and “ego” begin? When I “choose” something, rather than just “letting the situation be,” is that my ego speaking, or am I making a legitimate choice? I find it confusing. When I “choose” Suzy because I find her sweet and compassionate, rather than Jane because I find her temperamental and selfish, is that an “ego decision?” Am I, in fact, caving in to my “ego fixation?” Some– who feel a lot like “false prophets”– would hold “yes.” It should matter not one bit whether it were Suzy or Jane in the bed next to me, because the “evolved self” loves all equally, and so it would make no difference. Doesn’t quite work though, does it?
It’s also ironic that these ego-less “everything is exactly as it should be” types have little or no problem lauding spritual “communities” in which those of a similar spiritual persuasion get together. And if everything is “exactly as it should be,” why did they find it necessary to give themselves a special name like Starlight Dancing-Bear rather than just stick with the Ebenezer Finkelstein they were given at birth? The fact that it is even an issue suggests to me that their ego is alive and well, and that “choice” does matter.
Of course, it still doesn’t answer the question of choice. Mother Theresa surely chose to live by that set of guidelines– they weren’t randomly plucked out of the air. Perhaps the real answer is to choose wisely, and to choose with intent. Make choices from a place of love, but don’t be a “spiritual idiot” who cultivates the “nothing matters” school of thought. Spiritual idiocy takes many forms, some of them quite “ordinary” in nature. I was a spiritual idiot for the last 7 years of my marriage, convincing myself that it “didn’t matter” that I lived in a sexless relationship with an emotionally abusive and unstable person, because I “should love people as they are.” Whether my ultimate choice to leave, with the understanding that you can “love” someone without having to “live with them” was “ego” or “free choice” speaking, I don’t know.
What I do know is that I will face these choice points in life again, and I will tend to get bogged down not on what I am doing, but in my reasons for doing.
Edit, added at 4:10pm:
And then again, sometimes things happen to good people that make the scale of my life seem so utterly insignificant.
She could use your support and prayers.
Edit, added at 7:30am, Tuesday morning:
Evidently, she has taken her site down. Whether her post was a hoax, or a way to get people’s sympathy we may never know.
My sense of True North tells me that the woman needs love and compassion (albeit for very different reasons) regardless of whether her family was truly killed by a drunk driver, or she wrote the story as an attention getting stunt. People do stupid and selfish things. Love them anyway…..
Comments (20)
If the soul is here for its own purpose, then it would mean that when it has accomplished what it set out to do in any given situation then maybe that’s when you “decide” that it is time to leave. I never understand people who decide that they choose to live in spirit only, doesn’t that defeat the purpose of living in the trinity, mind body and soul? This is a very thought provoking entry as it raises a ton of questions. Maybe MT was talking about choice that will uplift humanity. Surely living with suzy will allow you to be more giving of yourself, whereas Jane will suck up all of your time because she is needy. ???
Oh, so I’m not the only one with a dozen or so saved .txt items that have absolutely no relevance? (I actually have them saved in folderstitled “Random” and “Writings.” And, no, I don’t know why I have two of them…probably brainfarted that I already had a folder for such things. *smile*)
I think I am one of those spiritual idiots. Is it ego to decide to walk your path if you know it’s leading you away from someone who’s abusive? I stayed in a marriage with tons of problems (actually, I did that for two marriages), and I reached a point where I knew nothing I did could fix things…if I stayed. I had to leave. It wasn’t just about me but being able to provide something for my son. I wasn’t sure what, but I knew that relationship wasn’t it. I acknowledged my husband’s choices and told him that although I didn’t like the path he’d chosen, I’d still respect it…and I hoped he’d respect mine. I didn’t leave because Ididn’t love him…I just didn’t want to be around when he destroyed himself. (And he did, you know. He died of an overdose 2 1/2 years later.) Was it ego that made me leave? Or love of something more than my relationship with my husband?…my love of my relationship with myself…and that of my son?
I would love communal living…and I already have enough nicknames to make the right impression. *wink*
Peace and Love…here’s one now! GFW
OH! You posted your edit while I was commenting…so I went right away to offer Ivy what words I could muster. It is incredibly sad…
GFW
The mind boggles at the slithery ways of terminology.
The ego SHOULD chose; most often it’s the superego that does, or the ego makes the choice blindly driven by the id.
Or: You make choices based on the opinions and expectations of others instead of your own self-actualized experience and knowledge or by being blindly driven by unconcious fears and survival programs.
Or: You make choices because they’re the best choice for all involved (i.e., “healthy”) or through fear and need, or because you have lots of shit buried in the mud of your unconcious that has never been looked at and that makes you “react” instead of making actual choices.
Or: You pray about and make choices based on that small inner voice that comes from God (the “right” choice), or based on your own selfish, sinful wants, or based on ignorance and hatred and fear (both these last are the “wrong” choices.)
See what I mean? I could go on and on. But it all comes down to: you make the best choice you can at the time with the information you have and you live with the consequences. And everything is choice, not just for us but for everybody else too.
T
I have to write it all down too; you’re not losing your mind and you’re not an old fart. Forgetful, perhaps.
Great thoughts here. And I love your point about starlight dancing bear. It can be so frustrating to attempt reconciling all the different elements of living. But I don’t suppose we’d do it if we didn’t feel it was our responsibility as humans. I certainly don’t have the answers to your questions, even though I know you weren’t asking me for them. Your path is one of self-inquiry and I can relate, for I walk a similar path. And honestly, I don’t want to find all the answers; bitch and moan as I might, the challenge of the quest is what keeps me searching.
agreed, that link does make things seem insignificant.. though onto the subject of hurt/pain, I tend to think it’s relative… whatever hurts a person, hurts a person, whether it be a broken nail, or breaking up. (I know, drastic examples, but you get the jist). But her pain, I’m quite sure, is more than I ever care to feel!
I actually believe that a good, strong, healthy ego is the key to a good, strong, healthy spirituality. Am I too far out? Actually, I rather liked Rudolph Steiner’s notion of “worlds” that we incarnate through ~ this one being the world of the ego ~ and that it is really important here to develop a good sense of self. And then in the yoga that I teach, Kundalini Yoga, there is the same philosophy on the ego. You have to first have a good, strong, healthy ego to achieve an egoless perception of oneness. So the questions you have raised here are good ones. There are a lot of holes in New Age logic, alas. You’ve found a rather large one… and it’s not a rabbit hole to go falling down. xo
Hey, chill. It’s all good, dude.
Seriously: I have never thought that ego was a bad thing. I am far closer to Howard Roark in temperament than I am to anyone self-named “Starlight Dancing-Bear.” I am always the first to ask how things ought to be, and I’m always trying to improve what I do or what I see around me (i.e. a super-sized pain in the ass to a lot of the people around me, although I’m harder on myself than I am on them). That’s ego, fundamentally. It isn’t something I apologize for. I believe, ultimately, that you are what you do. The people I see who come closest to succeeding in obliterating their selves (not themselves, but their selves) don’t do anything at all, and then they aren’t part of some cosmic whole or whatever, they’re just nothing. They’re irrelevant. And a lot of bad things are done in the world while they’re sitting around feeling swell. I would argue that it takes a strong ego to be a Mother Theresa.
Hello, just wanted to thank you for stopping by today!
Steiner had 7 worlds, I think, this being the 4th, right in the middle.
Word on Xanga just now is that Ivy Jewel is actually Juliet DeWal, a single mother living in Ontario, and a Christian fundamentalist. Since I never read the entry, I have no idea what is going on. Something about her husband in an accident. Though someone at Xanga phoned the area and nothing reported in any hospitals, etc., and she’s not even married. This link’s going round. Anway, she’s closed her site down.
O, how fun Xanga can be!
This is a good rabbit hole to hang out, no?!
Well… you raise some really great questions! I think… and your distinction is yours to make, but here’s what I think… that the difference between the ego and the choice thing is that when we choose something based on ego standards, yeah we probably screw things over. But when we use our emotional guidance system – our gut check – to intuitively know what feels right (whole lifetimes of lessons in figure that out), we choose well. And as I was telling someone very close to me last night, “If you follow your gut on things, there isn’t anything you can do that will exclude you from any such future you screwed yourself from having, because your gut will not steer you wrong. It can seem wrong from your perspective at times, but in the long run you will be brought around to exactly what would be better for you, more in line with what you really want. You’ll get there. It may take a while but you eventually begin trusting that nothing you do, when you do it or don’t do it based on your intuitive decision making skills, will leave you out in the cold.”
hmmm. My ego tells me I should be able to fix my marriage, to hang on, to manage, despite the… etc, etc.. but it’s the damn fear that always tends to win in the end. The choice I make is to not make a choice. Know a good therapist?
btw, the link? friggin girl is a phony after all & has split. Sick sick woman praying on people’s compassion.
Choice and ego seems like apples and oranges to me. My hope is that I can learn to put my ego aside long enough to see what my best choice is. And at my age that separation; that stepping outside my comfort zone (read neuroses) and giving the situation an objective slant, gives any situation a healthier interpretation. I’ve recently been aware of this separating thing and at first I thought it was worrisome but now I think it’s a step in the right direction.
Talking to J prior to yoga class yesterday she made this statement. “I had to divorce my husband.” Well, I’ve thought about this a good bit since then. Had, of course, is the operative word. I’m betting she had a choice – so I’d like to know more about what she meant by “had to.” When do we think we no longer have a choice? Is it after we have already made up our mind and just have not realized it? Thanks for the post. It sure has promted a lot of reader to comment and with extensive comments too.
You have raised some very good questions, which gives me more to think about. Thanks.
The whole ego thing is one that makes me think too much too. Is it just being selfish or is looking out for oneself the right way to go? The trick would be looking out for oneself without being selfish. I often wrestle with the concept of being good. I do good things, help others. Do I do those good things because I’m good or do I do them because I want to be good? Another confusing one.
Great post. Your discussion of “choice points” made me reflect on my own moments of decision, whether they were ego-driven or not is always hard to say. It probably depends on the situation.
I think la_chatte_gitane nailed it with her comment, especially the last bit: But it all comes down to: you make the best choice you can at the time with the information you have and you live with the consequences. And everything is choice, not just for us but for everybody else too.
I accept this truism because it helps me live with my mistakes, but that doesn’t mean I don’t try to develop a better base of understanding from which to make future choices from. Just keeps me from agonizing over what is already done and cannot be changed. And applying it to others helps me be compassionate – how many times have you heard someone berate anothers’ life choice, as though they knew everything that was going on in that person’s life, and could see far better than they what choice should be made?
dESTRUCTIVE
Shoot, sorry…Computer wigged out on me…
I am trying again
Destructive level of awareness…this is why we decided to let our kids homeschool us. Yes, your read that correctly. Very intentionally, we have decided to get out of their way–in a sense–to not dampen any awareness they might glean from their choices. And the exercise, for us anyway, has shown us a world that isn’t driven by the ego or the masses or fear– Simply, it is driven by a deeper need for joy, love, and knowing than a need for pain, hate, and ignorance.
restraining fingers on keys- enough said.